Persistent pain
Persistent pain after hip arthroscopy is a symptom with several potential causes. First determine whether the patient never improved, improved and then plateaued, had a pain-free interval followed by recurrence, or developed a new pain pattern. The timeline often narrows the differential before additional imaging is obtained. 1,2
| Timing / pattern | Think first about |
|---|---|
| Early, escalating, systemic, or unable to progress | Infection, hematoma, wound problem, fracture or stress injury, VTE, traction-related neuropraxia, fluid extravasation, or early instability. |
| Weeks to months, pain with rehabilitation or specific loading | Inadequate rehabilitation, hip-flexor/abductor overload, iliopsoas, capsular irritability, adhesions, heterotopic ossification, or extra-articular/referred pain. |
| Late, recurrent mechanical groin pain or failed return to function | Residual FAI, labral/chondral pathology, adhesions, instability/capsular insufficiency, dysplasia/version issues, progression of chondral disease/OA, or a competing diagnosis. |
Evaluation
- Re-read the pre-op diagnosis, imaging, operative report, procedure images, implant record, and rehabilitation course. Identify what was treated and what was intentionally not treated.
- Repeat a full history and hip/regional examination. The current pain map may differ from the pre-operative map.
- Obtain current radiographs. Use CT with three-dimensional assessment when residual cam/pincer morphology or version is a key question. Use MRI/MRA selectively for soft tissue, cartilage, capsule, or alternative pathology.
- Treat postoperative MRI/MRA cautiously. Labral signal, capsular change, and paralabral findings may occur in asymptomatic patients. 3,4
- Use selective intra-articular or extra-articular injections when they will answer a localization question. Reassess activity, rehabilitation, lumbar, pelvic, and psychosocial contributors in parallel.
- If infection is possible, obtain inflammatory markers and aspirate when indicated before antibiotics in a clinically stable patient. See the infection section.
Revision is not synonymous with “more arthroscopy.” Residual bony impingement, adhesions, instability, and labral/chondral pathology may be treatable arthroscopically in selected patients. Dysplasia, marked version abnormality, advanced arthritis, or a non-hip diagnosis may call for periacetabular/femoral osteotomy, arthroplasty, non-operative care, or another specialty pathway instead. 1,2,5
Important considerations:
Rapidly worsening hip pain, fever, wound drainage, pain out of proportion, inability to bear weight, a new neurologic deficit, calf or chest symptoms, and suspected fracture or instability require urgent assessment.
References
- Shin JJ, de Sa D, Burnham JM, et al. Refractory pain following hip arthroscopy: evaluation and management. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018;5:3-14. doi:10.1093/jhps/hnx046. Read on Rounds
- Cvetanovich GL, Weber AE, Kuhns BD, et al. Revision hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of diagnoses, operative findings, and outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1382-1390. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.009. Read on Rounds
- Ross JR, Larson CM, Bedi A. Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1388-1395. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-4069-9. Read on Rounds
- Kim YJ, et al. Frequency of postoperative MR arthrographic findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after hip arthroscopic surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1080-1086. doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16665. Read on Rounds
- Keogh MJ, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for capsulolabral adhesions after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2025;41:124-136. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.04.056. Read on Rounds